Evaluation

What were the aims/purposes of the script and key frames?

The idea of my key frames and script was to strongly represent the nazis and jewish culture, I went about this by taking shots of the brutal realism in relation to historical content, by using large war machines and suitable props, much alike my two films Defiance and Inglorious bastards, the camera angles gave certain shots a divide of power and some a clear domination of power, the shots were also edited to suit the wartime like era, the correct shades being used to add effect, I wanted to make my keyframes powerful, hold a meaningful message or relation to my textual analysis, the representation of Nazis and Jews varied at times, and my key-frames show a drastic change when the variations occurred.

What codes and conventions identified in the textual analysis essay were used in the script and key frames?

In my textual analysis I refer to the many scenes where power is one way or the other, there is no real balance or challenging factor to be questioned, the use of large and deadly machinery in Defiance and Inglorious bastards is evident the clips I refer to show such in some cases, therefore I used large machinery in my first keyframe to replica the sheer and clear intention of either side, to kill as many of the opposition as possible, yet the blame lies with the Nazis for sparking all of the conflict in the first place, representing themselves in a crude and unjust manner. In my textual analysis I show how the Jews wish for revenge and are in-fact a force in their own right, donning certain types of weaponry and so forth, forming a resistance, this is shown in my keyframe where the explosion occurs, noting the idea that the Jews were not just represented as a weak and hopeless force, they had some bite to them, this relates to Tuvia Bielski in Defiance where he craves revenge for the deaths of his parents, culling a family of Nazis at point-blank range those who he blamed for the death of his family.

How was the location report used in construction of the key frames?

For the urban setting of a small Polish town I used the grounds of my school, therefore making it rather urban and suitable, tight corridors and large doors being a good frame work for my keyframes, the steel gates outside the entrance being a suitable place for me to line people up, the shots of the tanks were taken at Chathams Royal engineering museum, this was suitable for my frames due to it's gritty and muddy setting, the tanks being outside and in a position where I could gather the shots I need.



How successful was the script and key frames in achieving its aims? 
I feel as if that my script and keyframes were successful in trying to present how Nazis and Jews are represented, I strongly believe that the ten key frames I used helped create an understanding and overall a strong partnership with my script, the two of them linking up very well and supporting one another, the points I got across in my textual analysis link to my frames and how they lay out, on the other hand I believe that more key-frames should have been taken in order to explain and expand the ending of my script, it was left on a rather stale note, perhaps confusing people. Overall I was very satisfied with the pictures of the tanks, I feel as if my first key-frame really sets the scene for what will come, or is to be expected. Where as the use of props could have been better, the lack of a standing out uniform and use of weaponry perhaps had an effect on the way my key-frames were shown, as for the location I was pleased with where my frames were shot, I struggled to find anything more suitable then what I had. Aside the minor issues I came across I strongly believe that the point my textual analysis makes in relation to the representation of Nazis and Jews is supported by my key-frames and my script.

 The effect of video nasties in society was varied depending on the audience and how these films were viewed, some films were simply full of gore displaying no real realistic themes, events that wouldn't occur in society at the time. On the other hand some films had a huge influence on people, imitable behaviour being a large risk to the communities, the possibility of certain happenings in the films becoming reality. The censorship of certain films did very little to stop the distribution of the films to the public, they were still illegally sold and watched by primarily teenagers all over the country, once banned they become a film that needs to be watched due to the content that is deemed unhealthy for society.

The so called moral panic spoke of during the showing of video nasties was blown up by the media, newspapers and radio stations claiming that these cheaply made films were the routes of societies challenges and issues. It was all used a scapegoat to blame other societal issues, the riots due to political motivated choices, the shutting down of the mining industry, it all had a huge effect regarding how these specific people viewed the government, ultimatley pinning the blame on them. The video nasties were portrayed as these morally destroying films that influenced the violence seen on the streets at the time, for those with easy access to media and little access to the actual happenings, for the most part they'd believe what was being said. I believe that for the socially blind people the use of video nasties as a scapegoat for every day issues worked in the conservative governments favour to win them over in believing the true horror of these films, they also flocked to religious groups whom sought to rid of these films to protect the minds of society alongside religious beliefs.

The National viewers and listeners association a well known pressure group, run by a elderly christian housewife named Mary Whitehouse, she believed that these films were degrading the way in which we think, her worry being for the younger generation primarily. As much as I think her motives were simply religiously based, she was certainly the frontline of protecting society from explicit content that shouldn't be viewed by teenagers. Furthermore her support was wide span, the government very supportive of her actions, some could question the way in which a pressure group was given support, but it was needed to allow the awareness of the issues revolved around video nasties.

The Video recordings act was introduced in 1984 by the conservative government, this was a way of limiting video nasties and making them illegal to watch, if you was found in possession of any of the listed video nasties that the government published, you'd be arrested, furthermore if you went a step further and sold them at local pubs, parks and social centres the consequences would be far more dire. The British board of film classification took control of what films were to be released and what ones were to be banned, these measures were taken due to the conservative government not trusting the stability of the public, fearing imitable behaviour similar to what are in the films, I don't agree with this as the large majority of the public are far from mentally unstable, the whole thing used as a scapegoat for issues present at the time.

The audiences whom enjoyed watching these films were blamed for many horrendous crimes committed, yet you cannot assume that any crime or horrid act is due to the viewing of a film, there are people out there who will commit criminal offences regardless of if they've watched a film. Audiences wanted to watch these films due to their hype, nearly every film appearing a challenge with daring phases like 'Viewers beware you may faint', this made it more appealing to watch, an attractive draw in for teenagers, the introduction of VHS making it trendy to gather with friends and watch these video nasties.

What factors led to the decline of town or city centres cinemas in the last 1970's and early 1980's

There were three main factors that led to the decline in cinemas during the 19070's and 1980's, in a larger context these were social, technological and economic reasons, but if we break each one down, we find a much more detailed analysis of why this decline occurred. The uprising of the home video systems played a large role in cinema attendance, technological changes had an effect, as did the use of pirated films, forming a much cheaper way to watch films, larger and more appealing showcasing areas became available, meaning smaller and less developed cinemas couldn't compete.

The rise of the multiplex carved the way for a more appealing and profitable way to watch films, changing the way in which expectations were set, the exhibition of films altering and evolving forwards, this ultimately destroyed many of the independent cinemas also known as flea pits, the more targeted audience being teenagers now, meaning these very comfortable and large multiplexes would be placed near or in shopping centres, to attract young shoppers whom have a disposable income.

The use of illegal pirated films made it easy for people to watch films from home on their home video systems, this had an effect on cinema attendances, the recession making it more appealing for people to watch films at home. This also sparked an issue with production and the start of blockbusters, films that had visual effects, ones that would be very low quality if watched from home were becoming a must thing to see at the cinema, the large screens and sound systems making the experience much more satisfying, the rich stories of films were being sacrificed for special effects, to attract teenagers towards the screens.

The way in which films were distributed changed when the creation of multiplexes came to be, there was known competition between the flea pits and these new multi-screen complexes, due to wanting control the distribution companies rarely sold newly made films to the flea pits. This meant that many smaller cinemas in towns and cities would find themselves without business, not able to show specific films that were shown elsewhere. Another similar example of this would be the creation of event movies, a trend or hype was formed by mass marketing of the product, special effect driven films were very popular, the release of these films would be during the summer breaks, where teenagers and people in general have time to waste, the already hyped atmosphere making people want to watch it, the most viable place to see such would be the multiplexes, other cinemas not able to screen it.

I conclude that the reason for the decline in cinemas in the 1970's and 1980's was largely because of the creation of multiplexes, the flea pits had a form of competition that they were simply unable to keep up with, therefore crafting a new way for films to be screened, multi-screen complexes with large screens and comfortable seating. ( Missing rest )

Textual analysis and creative artefact

The noise of nearing tanks from the distance is heard throughout the town, the ground shaking beneath the residents feet, the camera then changes to the perspective of the incoming soldiers, marching in large numbers they close in on the town, the camera shot now changing to look side on at the marching men, the sky dark as it begins to rain.(1)

 

Now focused on an individual man. 

Albercht Eugen, young aged perhaps early 20’s, dressed in a ragged fashion, large trenchcoat covering his frame, a brown helmet upon his head, marches towards the town, closing in, his gun held in a fashion suggesting that he is ready to use it, the man shaking clearly in some form of discomfort (2).The sound of shouting German soldiers now ringing through the air, a sense of urgency now present.

Albercht Eugen: ‘Round em up!’ (Runde em up)

Franz: ‘Clear the buildings, check everywhere!’(Löschen Sie die Gebäude, überall

Houses are searched and cleared, Albercht Eugen approaches a door slamming his fist against it, not enough he plants a charge on the door, stepping back standing aside Franz.(3)

Albercht Eugen: ‘Ready?’(Bereit?)

Franz: ‘Yes, blow the charge, make it quick!’(Ja, blaset die Gebühr, ermöglichen das schnelle)

The two men cover there ears bracing themselves for the explosion(4), a click can be heard via a remote held in hand, a small explosion occurring, knocking the door down, the men charge into the house guns held at the ready, the sound of women and children screaming in the distance evident, footsteps scurrying around the upper-parts of the house.

The two men walk down the slim dark hallway,(5) holding their guns ready to use of needs be, they move room to room, the setting seemingly that of a usual family home, ornament objects spread around the room, it seems like no one is around, footsteps coming from the rooms above.

Franze: 'Upstairs, with me!'

Albercht Eugen: 'After you!'

The men make way for the stairs, stepping up them with caution treading lightly,(6)  guns raised pointing towards the door that remains at the top of the stairs, once at the door they slowly push it open, a creaking noise heard as the door opens.

Franz: 'Check the corners!'

Albercht: 'Understood!'

Once in the dark room, the footsteps stop, a small and innocent figure arises from the Darkness, a young boy holding hischest both of her hands resting upon a large bulge under his coat, the men point their guns at the child, not aware nor paying attention to what rests underneath.(7)

Franz: 'Halt!'

Albercht: 'Don't move!'

The soldiers walk forth, Franz grabs the child by the shoulder leading her down the stairs and out of the house, into the streets, the child is placed aside the mass lines of Jewish people, whilst such occurs Albercht searches the room, finding a middle aged man, repeating the process of his peer, leading him outside the house, placing him in the line aside the child.(8)

The evident Father of the child at this point leans down towards his son, slowly loosening the buttons upon his chest, soon revealing what appears to be a explosive device attached to his chest, the German soldiers rushing around to line up yet more Jews, occupied elsewhere to pay any real attention, the Father kisses his child on the forehead, pulling a string upon the device, the explosion being set off, causing chaos to whomever would be in it's radius*(9)



Key frames

This keyframe shows us the extent to which the Germans power extends, large machinery with heavy weapons are used to move through the streets, eliminating anything that would be deemed a threat, this relates to both my films due to the balance of power, the Germans have much more firepower in comparison to the Jewish people, the tint allows us to understand how the tank would be viewed as a photo back in world war two.

              This keyframe allows us to understand the normality of everyday life in Poland, how life went  on as usual, that the events soon to come were going to change this seemingly normal atmosphere rather quickly. This relates to how many scenes are set in Defiance where towns and streets are left in a state of peace, until the Nazis appear wishing destruction upon everything, the way in which the shot is taken allows the scene to be viewed as a whole.The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

The saying 'Boots on the ground' appeals to this above shot, representing the nearing approach of the German soldiers, this allows us to understand the stereotypical brutality of the Nazis during world war two, and their seriousness to the situation at the time, men on the ground normally the clearest indication of what is intended, the once peaceful and silent town is soon to find it's streets swarmed with enemy soldiers, the shot is taken almost in line with the boot to create a meaningful statement, the Germans are coming, marching and ready.The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

  

The above shot shows us the German soldiers conducting their door to door search,  you can see both german soldiers armed and ready to breach a door, allowing access inside, they seem hardly phased nor reluctant to make an entrance, their intent clear, relating to Defiance in the sense of loyalty, they have a task and nothing will alter their mindset to perhaps sway them in a different direction, there facial expressions clearly focused and determined, a sense of professionalism evident, the way in which this is shot allows us to see the way in which the German soldiers in uniform present themselves, the way in which they conduct the searches very disciplined.The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

Now inside the house they conduct their search professionally, as shown they work as a team to clear the building, this shot showing how their weapons are constantly aimed forth, ready to shoot any hostile Jews if needs be, relating to historic content most of the Jewish people put up little resistance thus making this job seemingly easy, this challenges the idea of Defiance where a group of Jewish survivors defend themselves, perhaps challenging the stereotypes. This shot is taken from the belief that they are entering an unknown room, the camera angled down onto them, meaning they are exposed and perhaps uncertain of what might come.The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

In this shot you can see the German soldiers inside the room that they've just breached, they appear to act in a cold and relentless manner towards the Jewish being, the way in which they approach the situation shows us how the Nazis present themselves, ready to take an innocent life if needs be. The way in which this is shot allows an indication of where the power is, the Soldiers being above the kneeling figure, phallic objects pointing downwards towards the victims head. The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

In this key frame, we can see how the Germans line up the Jews in the streets, this relates to historic content, how the Germans treated the Jews, any sense of power for the Jews not evident, the way in which this is shot allows us to see the despair on every Jews face. The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

In this key frame we can see a parent protecting his child, the child appears to have his hand upon his chest, clearly hiding something of importance, the father is seen glancing away towards a group of German soldiers, hate evident in his eyes, the lust for revenge present, the child seemingly innocent and sweet has an explosive device strapped to it's chest, ready to explode, this supports the idea of resistance which is shown in Defiance, this supports my macro as the way in which the Jewish people are represented stereotypically isn't fully correct, the shot is taken at a slightly angled position to show that the power isn't one sided and that the child could alter the balance.The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.

The above key frame shows us the devastation of the explosion, how the weapon and uniform remains upon the floor, seemingly the death of a German soldier, the remains of what once were a man, the result of a Jewish resistance, trying to fend off those that invade it's home, yet this can also be seen as an act of terrorism despite the German efforts, the way in which this is shot shows us that the remains of the soldier holds no power, nor any influence.The war time like tint in the shot adds to the effect which suggests it's set in World war two.



Essay

Hypothesis: 'Defiance and Inglorious Bastards are both independent films.The representation of Jews and Nazis varies in both films, the directors both try to get across their own messages and beliefs

The two scenes from the two films show us the difference in Leadership between Inglorious bastards and Defiance, the two role figures give a speech to those present. Aldo Raine in Inglorious bastards is presented in a very disciplined and formal way, the men present allow him their full attention and respect, he speaks in a brutal and relentless manner, wanting to kill as many Nazis as possible, no matter the risk. Where as in Defiance Tuvia Bielski presents his speech to the people much differently, addressing the need for survival and the need for togetherness, he mentions little about slaughtering Nazis, just doing what is needed to stay alive. Furthermore he also speaks of the group of fleeing Jews to be like a community, stating how all are welcome. In comparison the American born Jews are presented as much more fierce and deadly figures, where as the European Jewish community are seen as more fragile, wanting to simply stay alive, this allows us to understand the relevance the film also has in terms of historic content, the Americans would have a solid and firm leader, perhaps even fearless, where as the Jews may have someone who doesn't carry said traits.

The message the directors are trying to create is that success may be great with a strong and abled leader, someone whom can rally the people and move them in a bright direction.

The Camera in both scenes is focused on the man speaking, briefly glancing to the others present in the scene at times, the focus remains on the speakers to simply imply that the two are of importance, powerful figures, the close up shots also back this up.

The scenes from the two films show us a flict and the relationships between the two leaders and their followers, the conflict in Defiance is an inner conflict, where as in Inglorious bastards its with the Nazi Officer. In Defiance an inner conflict erupts between siblings, two brothers whom don't see eye to eye, this allows us to understand the issues that occur within a group of people fleeing for their lives, mercy is shown by the victor of the fight, Tuvia Bielski restrains himself from killing his brother. On the other hand in Inglorious bastards the situation is much different, Aldo Raine finds himself in a situation where he does not need to fight for a dominant position, those who follow him have seemingly come to their leaders aid, yet in Defiance Tuvia Bielski fights alone without aid, once deemed useless the German Officer is killed, not by the hand of Aldo Raine, but one of his men, no mercy has been shown, and they seem to stay calm and collected during the situation, this follows the typical Hollywood style, a group of Americans remaining the dominant figures, pictured in the correct light.The message is quite clear that with relationship conflict will be present at some stage, be it family or friends, yet being viewed in a certain light can grant you power, as showed in Defiance the brothers fight for dominance, and overall the man whom comes out on top will gain the positive view from the people building a strong relationship, meaning that power is also now yours.

In both scenes, the camera follows a power-like structure, especially in Defiance where the power switches between the two fighters, the weaker man always being looked down on from above, or in the concluding part of the scene where the camera is angled to look upwards towards the 'victor' of the fight. Inglorious bastards follows a much similar structure, yet the power is more fixated towards the Americans, the struggling Nazi Officer is seen in no 'shot of power'.

In the two scenes below a real display of how the two films compare regarding killing and completing a goal or objective is evident, in Defiance the Jews are much more unorganised, they have no plan, where as in Inglorious bastards the organisation is planned, the American Born jews are all highly trained soldiers, where as in Defiance most of the men hardly know how to shoot a gun. Defiance represents the professionalism of the jews rather lowly in most situations, which supports its independent film structure as not all men are suddenly highly trained soldiers, where as in Inglorious bastards they are all trained and 'able', few of the men die during the process of the film, supporting the typical Hollywood styled film. Director Edward Zwick tends to follow a similar trend in his historic events based films, wanting to make them as 'realistic' as possible, a large reason for why the Jews in Defiance follow a low level of professionalism in the fighting sector.

In both scenes the camera gives certain close-ups to show power and dominance, the power shifts in inglorious bastards between the men around the table, as no real understanding of power can be settled, it's very much up in the air, as for Defiance the scene is shot from a distance, allowing us to see the whole fight, showing us that the fighting is balanced for the most part, and that power diverts towards the Jews once they gain the upper hand.

Both scenes below show us how the Jews take their revenge and the manner in which they do it, the lack of emotion in Inglorious bastards is evident, where as in Defiance the emotion shown when hate and revenge is released is different. The Scene in where the American born jews blow up the theatre filled with the German officers is a well planned movement, demonstrating the measures these men will take to see their foes fall, once the doors close and the American born jews open fire the lack of emotion is evident and very obvious. Where as in Defiance Tuvia Bielski is seeking revenge for his parents, yet the fashion in which it's carried out is much different, he finds himself emotionally blocked, and the hesitant nature to pull the trigger. The message the director is trying to get across in Inglorious bastards is the ruthless and non-emotional stance the American born jews take when confronting their hatred against the Germans, their revenge is far from a struggle to contain, they grasp the opportunity they are given, the director suggests that they are strong-hearted, tough and emotionless. In comparison to Defiance the two scenes are very different, the director of Defiance aims to suggest that the emotional struggle of approaching you're foes is tough, that the hatred and revenge is emotional, a struggle to an extent, the message clear and simple, as much as sating you're revenge is satisfying it comes at an emotional cost.

In both scenes the camera is directed towards those with power, in Inglorious bastards the camera looks down upon the struggling German officers, all trying to escape, weak and vulnerable in their current position, Defiance follows a similar idea, the camera is looking down onto the kneeling man, the gun pointed in his direction, the power and dominance pointed towards Tuvia Bielski, the lighting also above his head shining down on him, showing us the importance of his figure and stance.

The way in which  the jews are represented in Inglorious bastards follows the typical Hollywood narrative, showing us that American Born Jews are strong hearted, abled fighters and overall a more powerful figure. In Defiance the director sticks to a more independent style, playing out a clearer and more accurate set of events for what it would of been like in the past for fleeing Jews in Nazi occupied Europe. The structure of both films is bold and the messages and beliefs that the directors get across are evident, what you see is what you get, there are few sly and discreet messages during both films, a pattern that has been followed. Overall Defiance supports a historical representation of Jews the messages from the director mainly revolve around struggle and fear, where as Inglorious bastards presents the American born Jews in a stereotypical way, having them overcome most issues and appear as abled and strong figures.

Coursework blog

Exodus: Gods and kings

Trailer is thrilling and intense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-8YsulfxVI

Advertising all over the place, cinemas, buses, papers, Tv, internet.

Budget: $140,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend: $24,115,934 (USA) (12 December 2014)

Showings at the cinema are on every few hours, nearly one after another.

What social, economic & technological context gave rise to the blockbuster film from 1975-1983?American Film Studios built multiplex cinemas on the outskirts of town in a shopping centre in England to replace the single screen cinemas that were also known as 'flee pits' that advertised their Hollywood films. Due to the fact that there was more than one screen meant that there was a variety of films available to watch that the audience could chose from, however they were the same formulaic structure which meant that all it was doing really was leading us to believe people had a choice.Their Hollywood films were known as blockbusters which were new movies with the added spectacle which brought new interest to the screen. The fourth Star Wars Film: A New Hope directed by George Lucas was a well known American production that was all spectacle; alternate universe, explosions, lasers, light sabers and aliens which changed the course of cinema from then onwards.
In the time frame between 1975 and 1983 the teenage demographic was on an increase due to the social events that became increasingly common and the new rage of things to do was attend the new and improved multiplex cinemas; due to the disposable income that teenagers were entitled to from their parents meant they could go out and do what they wanted. Due to the majority of viewers in cinemas being teenagers meant that they were the huge influence on the ratings of films and the summer blockbusters. From 1975, due to this, new eras of film were born such as the disco era from which the blockbuster, 'Saturday Night Fever' was produced in 1977; this film was directed at the new and common teenage demographic that were the reason for majority of the multiplex cinema's income.

Hypothesis: 'Defiance and Inglorious Bastards are both independent films.The representation of Jews and Nazis varies in both films, the directors both try to get across their own messages and beliefs

The two scenes from the two films show us the difference in Leadership between Inglorious bastards and Defiance, the two role figures give a speech to those present. Aldo Raine in Inglorious bastards is presented in a very disciplined and formal way, the men present allow him their full attention and respect, he speaks in a brutal and relentless manner, wanting to kill as many Nazis as possible, no matter the risk. Where as in Defiance Tuvia Bielski presents his speech to the people much differently, addressing the need for survival and the need for togetherness, he mentions little about slaughtering Nazis, just doing what is needed to stay alive. Furthermore he also speaks of the group of fleeing Jews to be like a community, stating how all are welcome. In comparison the American born Jews are presented as much more fierce and deadly figures, where as the European Jewish community are seen as more fragile, wanting to simply stay alive, this allows us to understand the relevance the film also has in terms of historic content, the Americans would have a solid and firm leader, perhaps even fearless, where as the Jews may have someone who doesn't carry said traits.
The message the directors are trying to create is that success may be great with a strong and abled leader, someone whom can rally the people and move them in a bright direction.

The Camera in both scenes is focused on the man speaking, briefly glancing to the others present in the scene at times, the focus remains on the speakers to simply imply that the two are of importance, powerful figures, the close up shots also back this up.

The scenes from the two films show us a flict and the relationships between the two leaders and their followers, the conflict in Defiance is an inner conflict, where as in Inglorious bastards its with the Nazi Officer. In Defiance an inner conflict erupts between siblings, two brothers whom don't see eye to eye, this allows us to understand the issues that occur within a group of people fleeing for their lives, mercy is shown by the victor of the fight, Tuvia Bielski restrains himself from killing his brother. On the other hand in Inglorious bastards the situation is much different, Aldo Raine finds himself in a situation where he does not need to fight for a dominant position, those who follow him have seemingly come to their leaders aid, yet in Defiance Tuvia Bielski fights alone without aid, once deemed useless the German Officer is killed, not by the hand of Aldo Raine, but one of his men, no mercy has been shown, and they seem to stay calm and collected during the situation, this follows the typical Hollywood style, a group of Americans remaining the dominant figures, pictured in the correct light.The message is quite clear that with relationship conflict will be present at some stage, be it family or friends, yet being viewed in a certain light can grant you power, as showed in Defiance the brothers fight for dominance, and overall the man whom comes out on top will gain the positive view from the people building a strong relationship, meaning that power is also now yours.

In both scenes, the camera follows a power-like structure, especially in Defiance where the power switches between the two fighters, the weaker man always being looked down on from above, or in the concluding part of the scene where the camera is angled to look upwards towards the 'victor' of the fight. Inglorious bastards follows a much similar structure, yet the power is more fixated towards the Americans, the struggling Nazi Officer is seen in no 'shot of power'.

In the two scenes below a real display of how the two films compare regarding killing and completing a goal or objective is evident, in Defiance the Jews are much more unorganised, they have no plan, where as in Inglorious bastards the organisation is planned, the American Born jews are all highly trained soldiers, where as in Defiance most of the men hardly know how to shoot a gun. Defiance represents the professionalism of the jews rather lowly in most situations, which supports its independent film structure as not all men are suddenly highly trained soldiers, where as in Inglorious bastards they are all trained and 'able', few of the men die during the process of the film, supporting the typical Hollywood styled film. Director Edward Zwick tends to follow a similar trend in his historic events based films, wanting to make them as 'realistic' as possible, a large reason for why the Jews in Defiance follow a low level of professionalism in the fighting sector.

In both scenes the camera gives certain close-ups to show power and dominance, the power shifts in inglorious bastards between the men around the table, as no real understanding of power can be settled, it's very much up in the air, as for Defiance the scene is shot from a distance, allowing us to see the whole fight, showing us that the fighting is balanced for the most part, and that power diverts towards the Jews once they gain the upper hand.

Both scenes below show us how the Jews take their revenge and the manner in which they do it, the lack of emotion in Inglorious bastards is evident, where as in Defiance the emotion shown when hate and revenge is released is different. The Scene in where the American born jews blow up the theatre filled with the German officers is a well planned movement, demonstrating the measures these men will take to see their foes fall, once the doors close and the American born jews open fire the lack of emotion is evident and very obvious. Where as in Defiance Tuvia Bielski is seeking revenge for his parents, yet the fashion in which it's carried out is much different, he finds himself emotionally blocked, and the hesitant nature to pull the trigger. The message the director is trying to get across in Inglorious bastards is the ruthless and non-emotional stance the American born jews take when confronting their hatred against the Germans, their revenge is far from a struggle to contain, they grasp the opportunity they are given, the director suggests that they are strong-hearted, tough and emotionless. In comparison to Defiance the two scenes are very different, the director of Defiance aims to suggest that the emotional struggle of approaching you're foes is tough, that the hatred and revenge is emotional, a struggle to an extent, the message clear and simple, as much as sating you're revenge is satisfying it comes at an emotional cost.

In both scenes the camera is directed towards those with power, in Inglorious bastards the camera looks down upon the struggling German officers, all trying to escape, weak and vulnerable in their current position, Defiance follows a similar idea, the camera is looking down onto the kneeling man, the gun pointed in his direction, the power and dominance pointed towards Tuvia Bielski, the lighting also above his head shining down on him, showing us the importance of his figure and stance.

The way in which  the jews are represented in Inglorious bastards follows the typical Hollywood narrative, showing us that American Born Jews are strong hearted, abled fighters and overall a more powerful figure. In Defiance the director sticks to a more independent style, playing out a clearer and more accurate set of events for what it would of been like in the past for fleeing Jews in Nazi occupied Europe. The structure of both films is bold and the messages and beliefs that the directors get across are evident, what you see is what you get, there are few sly and discreet messages during both films, a pattern that has been followed. Overall Defiance supports a historical representation of Jews the messages from the director mainly revolve around struggle and fear, where as Inglorious bastards presents the American born Jews in a stereotypical way, having them overcome most issues and appear as abled and strong figures.

Ryan Riddock: 1400 Words

Film studies notes/Exam prep.

How Does V for Vendetta Get Across its Message & Beliefs Through Its Themes

Theme 1- Revenge is one of the most important and noticeable themes in V for Vendetta, as V plots against the Government and their controlling ways, he seemingly is seen as an enemy to the government, and therefore is experimented on, his acts of rebellion and unlawful means are a show to us that he wishes to bring the people with power down, crumbling into nothing by dust, the overall outcome allowing people to govern themselves, but V also craves personal revenge due to the actions taken against him.

Theme 2- Terroism  is yet another theme displayed in the film, the actions of V are not perhaps that considered lawful and just, as much as people argue the character may be a villain, he is in-fact working outside the law and on his own accord, as if he has formed his own rule-book, yet V makes us question his actions, if they are correct and right, or simply wrong and evil, blowing up a Governmental building to make a stand and form a message could be considered a good deed, yet also an act of terroism and a wrong deed, this perhaps tells us that good people need to commit to bad things to get a positive and overall better result.

Theme 3- Realism is also another important message in this film, the severity of what is happening and the relevance of it to modern day happenings and how the Government work or may work. It allows us to understand that this is all reality, and a possibility in our own world, the rather normal settings, normal houses, this allows us to understand the time-frame in comparison to the film and present day isn't far apart.

Theme 4- Power is something strongly displayed in V for Vendetta, the power balance between the 

Government and the common people is far from even or fair, the Government do things how they please, and single out those who choose to disobey or make their own rules, V is an example of someone who stands up to those more powerful then him, makes a stand and attempts to have an outcome that will better the majority and not the minority, the people with power don't use it correctly, they only use it to better themselves.

Theme 5- Fear is shown in V for Vendetta as it's struck into the common people by default almost, as if the people are aware that going against the Government will only end up bad on their end, this tells us that perhaps the rights and wants of people are frowned upon and seen incorrect, that common thoughts and feeling about the way things are going should not be shared, and only kept to yourself, and if they are exposed publicly, you'll be punished, fighting against the fear is rarely seen, or simply some do not fear the Government, V being a good example.

Conclusion- The film gets across many messages, the list is rather endless, yet I feel as if the main and most striking message is that realism tells us this is all possible, it could happen in our modern day society, that it lurks on the horizon if things do not change quickly, the film allows us to understand that rules are put in place for people to follow, some choose to listen and others choose not to, V chooses not to thus he is seen as a threat.



Rough notes

In the clip shown Bradley cooper is evidently effected by the drug gives his performance a more energetic and determined vibe, his eyes are shining lightly perhaps a sign that his life has took a turn for the good, clothing is simple nothing fancy indicating he is perhaps a man of little wealth or simply Dosent care about his appearance, camera isn't focused on him specifically time overlaps to show his actions in the form of several people, giving us a positive and quick moving approach to things after the drug was taken

What is Dystopia

A dystopia is the idea of a society, generally of a speculative future, characterized by negative, anti-utopian elements, varying from environmental to political and social issues. Dystopian societies, usually hypothesized by writers of fiction, have culminated in a broad series of sub-genres and is often used to raise issues regarding society, environment, politics, religion, psychology, spirituality, or technology that may become present in the future. For this reason, Dystopias have taken the form of a multitude of speculations, such as Pollution; Poverty; Societal collapse or Political repression and Totalitarianism.

Dystopia theme




Camera shots
Space odyssey- close up of gorilla looking around to show how scared he is, when bone goes up the camera follows, to set the scene and atmosphere, low shots, high shots different angles. Tools (hunting). (Low angle = power ) narrative- Evolution (ape to man)  millions of years of evolution in one cut. Graphic match -bone- spaceship.



Evolution is going up and into different heights man kind is going into an unknown area, evolution has a connection to space, has to be a reason perhaps aliens? - Something to look out for is unusual shots.



Voyeurism - is the sexual interest in or practice spying on people engaged in intimate behaviour such as undressing, sexual activity, or other actions usually considered to be of a private nature. The principal characteristic of voyeurism is that the voyeur does not normally relate directly with subject of his/her interest. Secret photography can be described as stalking.

Main gaze- is a feminist theory, that was first developed by Laura mulvey, in 1975 the male gaze occurs

Deep focus- depth of field, is the measure that can be applied to the area in focus within the frame

Shallow focus- function of a narrow depth of field and it implies that only one place of the frame will remain sharp and clear.


Racking focus- filmmaker a can  change the focus of the lens to a subject in the background from the foreground

How the unusual shots give meaning and depth.

Shallow focus
Tracking shot ( following )
Close up of bad guy
Pov - point of view

Lots of close shots, getting the fear of the actors evident as batman takes them one by one.

Shallow focus is for added fear

Pov is to give us an idea of the surroundings and what is going on

Goodfella- panning, goes through back due to being more privileged, focus on two people following while way through.

Saving private Ryan - slow frames under water and no sound, close ups to display fear, camera is low down to show power, changes when they are shot, zoomed in close up slow motion. Extreme close up( nervous hand shaking)




Genres and messages/meaning

V for Vendetta

War
Science fiction
Action and adventure

Why does it fit into three genres?

Trying to make a wide audience base, based for male watchers , a mix of genders.

Is he a hero? Yes due to him solving peoples fears, yet can be argued, seen as a terrorist and criminal.

Story is about Evie, main character.

Thriller, Sci fi. Action, all masculine and make preferred male genres.

Why is it a science fiction?

It's not, set in the near future only sense of Sci fi, one of the main actors is a terrorist, things that are happening today and may happen in the soon future, democracy one leader, lack of freedom, realism separates it from the Sci-fi genre.

We experiment on terrorists, criminals, people who disagree with the Government, immigrants also a vulnerable target, disabled and weak, homosexuals. Stephen fry is black bagged after they find out he is homosexual.

What makes it a thriller?

Thriller- is a genre of literature, film, and television programming that uses suspense, tension, and excitement as its main elements.

Someone trying to catch V, investigator ( detective ) trying to stop him.  Film is shown from eveys point of view and also the detectives as he attempts to solve things, complex, mystery makes us question things.

Film spoilers, mystery.

Who is behind the mask, concentration camp, homosexual, criminal, religion, Goverment don't approve.

How it happened? Gases places secretively, saying they'd help it, blamed homosexuals, religion, created disease told everyone they could cure people see solution and flock to their side, Government get way.

Conspiracy theories.

Freedom for safety/protection.

Why/if is it an action?

Action elements, explosions knifes, weapons, smooth and entertaining, avoiding reality, V is skilled maybe trained? Superpowers?

Not a definable good or bad character V's actions are questionable, breaking the law, torture, perspectives.

Community of Villains, V destroys the Government building, symbol of corruption and a misleading factor, no Government means independence, personal responsibility, own choices.

Planet of the apes - Experiments, Money, Action, evolution

Tron 2- Science, futuristic, game, money and power.

Walle-e - Science, future, relationship,  struggle.

Conclusion for V for Vendetta 

V for vendetta represents reality in many ways showing us how the government can be corrupt misleading and controlling , the way in which this is presented is V the character and how he is a threat to the Government thus they see him as an enemy, terrorism is something that occurs in the modern day world, V is a terrorist and a criminal, change occurred quickly this can happen again and I think realism is a large part of this film a message perhaps, the way in which V is presented shows us that people could so well be like him in the future if the Government change in the way they did in the film, the setting is also in the soon future not the far future.

Themes:

Terrorism
Society
Governmental power
Rebelling
Power
Problem solving
Superheroes
Future



V is seen only a little bit the mask close up also, can be seen with the blades seemingly out to kill or harm, keep quiet and stay hidden.

Close ups show fear, always level and in the middle of the shot, shows separation and divide, the family shot shows disgust and disbelief due to lesbians, different= bad, rain scene focuses rain she is a blur, then slowly comes into focus.


Board work/Brainstorm